《财务报告与分析三友会计名著译丛第07章习题答案.docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《财务报告与分析三友会计名著译丛第07章习题答案.docx（15页珍藏版）》请在课桌文档上搜索。
1、Chapter 7Long-Term Debt-Paying AbilityPROBLEMSPROBLEM 71Earnings before interest and tax: Net sales $1,079,143 Cost of sales( 792,755) Selling and administration( 264,566) $ 21,822a.b.Cash basis times interest earned:PROBLEM 72 Recurring Earnings Excluding Interest Expense, Tax Expense, Equity Earni
2、ngs, a. Times Interest Earned = and Minority Earnings Interest Expense, Including Capitalized Interest Income before income taxes$675 Plus interest 60 Adjusted income$735 Interest expense$ 60Times Interest Earned = $735 = 12.25 times per year $60b.Adjusted income from (part a)$7351/3 of operating le
3、ase payments (1/3 x $150) 50Adjusted income, including rentals$785Interest expense$ 601/3 of operating lease payments 50 $110Fixed Charge Coverage = $785 = 7.14 times per year $110PROBLEM 73 Recurring Earnings, Excluding Interest Expense, Tax Expense, Equity Earning, a. Times Interest Earned = and M
4、inority Earnings_ Interest Expense, Including Capitalized InterestIncome before income taxes and extraordinary charges$36Plus interest 16(1) Adjusted income 52(2) Interest expense$16 Times Interest Earned: (1) divided by (2) = 3.25 times per year Recurring Earnings, Excluding Interest Expense, Tax E
5、xpense, Equity Earnings, and Minority Earnings + Interest Portionb. Fixed Charge Coverage = Of Rentals_ Interest Expense, Including Capitalized Interest + Interest Portion Of RentalsAdjusted income (part a)$ 521/3 of operating lease payments (1/3 x $60) 20(l) Adjusted income, including rentals $72In
6、terest expense $161/3 of operating lease payments 20(2) Adjusted interest expense $36Fixed charge coverage: (1) divided by (2) = 2.00 times per yearPROBLEM 74a. Debt Ratio = b.Debt/Equity Ratio = c.Ratio of Total Debt to Tangible Net Worth =Total Liabilities = $174,979 = $174,979 = 70.9%Tangible Net
7、 Worth $249,222 $2,324 $246,898d.Kaufman Company has financed over 41% of its assets by the use of funds from outside creditors. The Debt/Equity Ratio and the Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio are over 70%. Whether these ratios are reasonable depends upon the stability of earnings.PROBLEM 7-5RatioTra
8、nsactionTimesInterestEarnedDebtRatioDebt/EquityTotal Debt/TangibleNet Wortha. Purchase of buildings financed by mortgageb. Purchase inventory on short-term loanc.Declaration and payment of cash dividendd.Declaration and payment of stock dividende.Firm increases profits by cutting cost of salesf.Appr
9、opriation of retained earningsg.Sale of common stockh.Repayment of long-term bank loani.Conversion of bonds to common stock j.Sale of inventory at greater than cost-00+00+0-0-+0-0-+0-0-PROBLEM 76a.Times Interest Earned:Times interest earned relates earnings before interest expense, tax, minority ear
10、nings, and equity income to interest expense. The higher this ratio, the better the interest coverage. The times interest earned has improved materially in strengthening the longterm debt position. Considering that the debt ratio and the debt to tangible net worth have remained fairly constant, the
11、probable reason for the improvement is an increase in profits.The times interest earned only indicates the interest coverage. It is limited in that it does not consider other possible fixed charges, and it does not indicate the proportion of the firms resources that have come from debt.Debt Ratio:Th
12、e debt ratio relates the total liabilities to the total assets.The lower this ratio, the lower the proportion of assets that have been financed by creditors.For Arodex Company, this ratio has been steady for the past three years. This ratio indicates that about 40% of the total assets have been fina
13、nced by creditors. For most firms, a 40% debt ratio would be considered to be reasonable.The debt ratio is limited in that it relates liabilities to the book value of total assets. Many assets would have a value greater than book value. This tends to overstate the debt ratio and, therefore, usually
14、results in a conservative ratio. The debt ratio does not consider immediate profitability and, therefore, can be misleading as to the firms ability to handle longterm debt.Debt to Tangible Net Worth:The debt to tangible net worth relates total liabilities to shareholders equity less intangible asset
15、s. The lower this ratio, the lower the proportion of tangible assets that has been financed by creditors.Arodex Company has had a stable ratio of approximately 81% for the past three years. This indicates that creditors have financed 81% as much as the shareholders after eliminating intangibles from
16、 the shareholders contributionfor most firms, this would be considered to be reasonable. The debt to tangible net worth ratio is more conservative than the debt ratio because of the elimination of intangible items. It is also conservative for the same reason that the debt ratio was conservative, in
17、that book value is used for the assets and many assets have a value greater than book value. The debt to tangible net worth ratio also does not consider immediate profitability and, therefore, can be misleading as to the firms ability to handle longterm debt.Collective inferences one may draw from t
18、he ratios of Arodex, Company:Overall it appears that Arodex Company has a reasonable and improving longterm debt position. The debt ratio and the debt to tangible net worth ratios indicate that the proportion of debt appears to be reasonable. The times interest earned appears to be reasonable and im
19、proving.The stability of earnings and comparison with industry ratios will be important in reaching a conclusion on the longterm debt position of Arodex Company.b.Ratios are based on past data. The future is what is important, and uncertainties of the future cannot be accurately determined by ratios
20、 based upon past data.Ratios provide only one aspect of a firms long-term debt-paying ability. Other information, such as information about management and products, is also important.A comparison of this firms ratios with ratios of other firms in the same industry would be helpful in order to decide
21、 if the ratios are reasonable.PROBLEM 77 Recurring Earnings, Excluding Interesta. 1. Times Interest Expense, Tax Expense, Equity Earnings, Earned = and Minority Earnings_ Interest Expense, Including Capitalized Interest $162,000 = 8.1 times per year $ 20,0002. Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities Total As
22、sets $193,000 = 32.2% $600,0003. Debt/Equity Ratio = Total Liabilities Stockholders Equity $193,000 = 47.4% $407,000 4.Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio = Total Liabilities Tangible Net Worth $193,000 = 49.9% $407,000 $20,000b. New asset structure for all plans: Assets Current assets$226,000 Property
23、, plant, and equipment 554,000 Intangibles 20,000 Total assets$800,000 Liabilities and Equity Plan ACurrent Liabilities$ 93,000 $200,000,000/100 =Longterm debt 100,0002,000,000 sharesPreferred stock 250,000Common equity 357,000 No change in net income$800,000Plan BCurrent liabilities$ 93,000 $200,00
24、0,000/10 =Longterm debt 100,000 20,000,000 sharesPreferred stock 50,000Common stock 120,000Premium on common stock 300,000Retained earnings 137,000 No change in net income$800,000Plan CCurrent liabilities $ 93,000 Operating Income $162,000Longterm debt 300,000 Interest expense 52,000*Preferred stock
25、 50,000 110,000Common equity 357,000 Taxes (40%) 44,000 $800,000 Net Income $ 66,000* $20,000 + 16% ($200,000) = $52,0001.Recurring Earnings, Excluding Interest Expense,Times InterestTax Expense, Equity Earnings, and Minority Earnings Earned =Interest Expense, Including Capitalized InterestPlan APla
26、n BPlan C2.Debt = Total Liabilities Ratio Total Assets Plan A Plan B Plan C 3.Debt/Equity Ratio = Plan APlan BPlan C4.Debt to Tangible Net Worth = Plan A Plan B Plan C c. Preferred Stock Alternative:Advantages:1.Lesser drop in earnings per share than under the common stock alternative.2.Not the abso
27、lute reduction in earnings that accompanied the debt alternative.3.There would be an improvement in the Debt Ratio, Debt/Equity Ratio, and Total Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio.4.Does not have the reduced times interest earned that accompanied alternative of issuing longterm debt.Disadvantages:1.An
28、 increase in the fixed preferred dividend charge that the firm must pay before any dividends can be paid to common stockholders.Common Stock Alternative:Advantages:1.No increase in fixed obligations.2.There would be an improvement in the Debt Ratio, Debt/Equity Ratio, and the Total Debt to Tangible
29、Net Worth Ratio.3.Not the absolute reduction in earnings that accompanied the debt alternative.4.Does not have the reduced times interest earned that accompanied alternative of issuing longterm debt.Disadvantages:1.Maximum dilution in earnings per share of the three alternatives.Long-Term Bonds Alte
30、rnative:Advantages:1. Higher earnings per share than with common stock.Disadvantages:1.Material decline in Times Interest Earned.2.A material increase in the Debt Ratio, Debt/Equity Ratio,and Total Debt to Tangible Net Worth Ratio.3.Absolute reduction in earnings.4.Increase in the interest fixed cha
31、rge that must be paid.d.The 10% preferred stock increased the preferred dividends which are not tax deductible; therefore, the cost of these funds is the 10% amount. The 16% bonds are tax deductible and, therefore, the after-tax cost is 9.6% (16% x (1.40).Note to Instructor: You may want to take thi
32、s opportunity to point out to the students that the alternative that should be selected is greatly influenced by the change in earnings and the specific debt structure. The conclusions in this problem would not necessarily be true with changed assumptions.PROBLEM 78a.Times Interest Earned = Earnings
33、 from continuing operations beforeincome taxes and equity earnings(1) Add back interest expense(1) $ 74,780,000(2) Adjusted earnings(2) $ 37,646,000 $112,426,000Times interest earned: (2) divided by (1) 1.99 times per yearb.Earnings from continuing operationsPlus:(1) Interest$ 65,135,000 Income taxe
34、s 37,394,000(2) Adjusted earnings$140,175,000Times interest earned: (2) divided by (1) 3.72 times per yearc.Removing equity earnings gives a more conservative times interest earned ratio. The equity income is usually substantially more than the cash dividend received from the related investments. Th
35、erefore, the firm cannot depend on this income to cover interest payments.PROBLEM 79a.1.Times Interest Earned = 2.Debt Ratio = 3.Debt Equity = 4.Debt to Tangible Net Worth =b.No, Barker Company has a times interest earned of 5.3 times while the industry average is 7.2 times. This indicates that Bark
36、er Company has less than average coverage of its interest. Also, Barker Company has a much higher than average debt/equity, and debt to tangible net worth ratio.c.Allen Company has a better times interest earned, debt ratio, debt/equity, and debt to tangible net worth.PROBLEM 7-10a.1.Times Interest
37、Earned = 2004:$280,000 - $156,000= 7.29 times per year $17,0002003:$302,000 - $157,000= 9.06 times per year $16,0002002:$286,000 - $154,000= 8.80 times per year $15,0002001:$270,000 - $150,000= 8.28 times per year $14,5002000:$248,000 - $147,000= 4.39 times per year $23,000Recurring Earnings, Exclud
38、ingInterest, Tax Expense, EquityEarnings, and Minority Earnings +2.Fixed Charge Coverage = Interest Portion of Rentals Interest Expense, Including Capitalized Interest + InterestPortion of Rentals2004:$280,000 - $156,000 + $10,000= 4.96 times per year $17,000 + $10,0002003:$302,000 - $157,000 + $9,0
39、00= 6.16 times per year $16,000 + $9,000 2002:$286,000 - $154,000 + $9,500= 5.78 times per year $15,000 + $9,5002001:$270,000 - $150,000 + $10,000= 5.31 times per year $14,500 + $10,0002000:$248,000 - $147,000 + $9,000= 3.44 times per year $23,000 + $9,0003.Debt Ratio = Total Liabilities Total Asset
40、s2004:$88,000 + $170,000= 46.07% $560,0002003:$89,500 + $168,000= 46.48% $554,0002002:$90,500 + $165,000= 46.14% $553,8002001:$90,000 + $164,000= 46.31% $548,5002000:$91,500 + $262,000= 65.83% $537,0004.Debt/Equity = Total Liabilities Shareholders Equity2004:$88,000 + $170,000= 85.43% $302,0002003:$89,500 + $168,000= 86.85% $296,5002002:$90,500 + $165,000= 85.65% $298,3002001:$90,000 + $164,000= 86.25%
