剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx

上传人:夺命阿水 文档编号:1095020 上传时间:2024-03-15 格式:DOCX 页数:45 大小:703.34KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共45页
剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共45页
剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共45页
剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共45页
剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共45页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《剑桥风险研究中心-全球房地产崩溃压力测试场景(英)_市场营销策划_重点报告202301202_doc.docx(45页珍藏版)》请在课桌文档上搜索。

1、CambridgeCentreforRiskStudiesCambridgeRiskFrameworkCentreforRiskStudiesr三UniversityofFCAMBRIDGEIudgcBusinessSchlCambridgeCentreforRiskStudiesUniversityofCambridgeJudgeBusinessSchoolTrumpingtonStreetCambridge,CB21AGUnitedKingdomries.riskj6s.cam.ac.ukhttp,WWW.risk.jbs.cam.ac.ukDecember2015TheCambridge

2、CentreforRiskStudiesacknowledgesthegeneroussupportprovidedforthisresearchbythefollowingorganisations:TheviewscontainedinthisreportareentirelythoseoftheresearchteamoftheCambridgeCentreforRiskStudies,anddonotimplyanyendorsementoftheseviewsbytheorganisationssupportingtheresearch.Thisreportdescribesahyp

3、otheticalscenariodevelopedasastresstestforriskmanagementpurposes.Itdoesnotconstituteaprediction.TheCambridgeCentreforRiskStudiesdevelopshypotheticalscenariosforuseinimprovingbusinessresiliencetoshocks.Thesearecontingencyscenariosusedfor*what-ifstudiesanddonotconstituteforecastsofwhatislikelytohappen

4、.AssetBubbleCollapseStressTestScenarioGlobalPropertyCrashContents1 ExecutiveSummary22 FinancialCatastropheStressTestScenarios63 AssetBubblesasaFinancialCatastrophe114 DefiningtheScenario135 TheScenario156 ModellingBank-to-BankRelationshipsintheGlobalFinancialSystem177 MacroeconomicAnalysis208 Impact

5、onInvestmentPortfolio279 MitigationandConclusions3410 Bibliography35AssetBubbleCollapseStressTestScenarioGlobalPropertyCrashExecutiveSummaryTypically,anassetbubbleisonlyrecognisedasandwhenitbursts,withpricesdroppingrapidlyandsubstantially.Inthisscenariowedescribeanassetbubblecollapsethatiscausedbyin

6、flatedglobalrealestateassetprices.ItisoneoffourFinancialCatastrophescenarioscompletedinthisseriesofstresstestscenarios.Stresstestsareshowntobeaneffectivetoolforunderstandingcauseandeffectrelationshipsandforunderstandingriskexposureacrossaspectrumofextremeshocks,suchasthoseproposedintheCambridgeTaxon

7、omyofThreats,encompassingfiveclassesofbusinessrisk.,Cambridge Centre for Risk Studies, A Taxonomy of Threats for Complex Risk Managementw, 2014Asuiteofscenarioscanbeusedasabasisfortestingagainstvulnerabilitiesandimproveresilience.GlobalPropertyCrashManyofthecountriesaroundtheworldarealsothoughttobei

8、nthemidstofaloominghousingbubblecollapse. In come the wavesw, The Economist Special report, 16 June 2005TheGlobalPropertyCrashScenariodescribesapropertybubblethatistriggeredintheemergingboommarketsofSouthEastAsiaandpropagatesacrosscontinentsasinvestorsandbankslosefaithinglobalpropertymarkets.Followi

9、ngthehousingmarketcollapseinIndiaandChinathecontagionspreadsandaffectsbothmortgageandnon-mortgageassetpricesinAsiaPacific,Scandinavia,Europeandbeyond.Theeconomicimpactcausesaworldwiderecessionlastingfromoneyeartoeighteenmonthsacrossthedifferentscenariovariants.Theoverallloss,expressedaslostglobalGro

10、ssDomesticProduct(GDP)comparedwiththeprojectedbaselineeconomicoutputoverafiveyearperiod(GDPRisk),isestimatedasbeingbetween$13.2and$19.6trillion,dependingonthevariantofthescenario.TheGreatFinancialCrisisof2007-2011,comparatively,sawalossof$20trillionin2015dollarestimates.Acontextforfinancialcatastrop

11、heScenarioselectionOurresearchshowsthefrequencyofmarketbasedcatastropheshasincreasedwithglobalisation.Between1700and1900theaveragetimebetweencriseswas21years;sincei960,theintervalhasshrunktoeightyears. Needham, D., 4lHistorical Catalogues of Financial Catastrophes*, presentation at the University of

12、 Cambridge, 10 July, 2014Economicinterconnectivityplaysakeyroleintheseverityandthespreadofcontagionfromburstingassetbubbles.TheGlobalPropertyCrashScenariodepictsthecollapseofbothmortgageandnon-mortgageassetstriggeredintheemergingandBRICsmarketsbeforespreadingacrosstheworld.VariantsofthescenarioInour

13、 Prior to records from FTSE and S&P, We use surrogate stocks such as those from American railroad stock prices and other constructed indexes. We use similar surrogate data for estimating growth rates prior to the availability of standardised data. Our identification of%iles uses a normal curve fitti

14、ng which is nservative in light of the fat tails associated with equity price distributions.standard,scenario,Si,therealestateandequitymarketsareshockedbylossesofupto35%and10%respectivelyinacascadeacrosssixseparatecountrygroupings:Tier1-China&emergingmarkets;Tier2-theCommonwealth;Tier3-theNordics;Ti

15、er4-theUnitedKingdom;andTiers5and6-Europe.Marketsentimentislikewiseaffected,havinganimpactacrossallassetclasses,particularlysharemarketequities.InS2,theglobalpropertycrashextendstoinclude:Tier7-theUnitedStates;Tier8-PrudentEuropeandTier9-IndustrialAsia.Inthisvariant,therealestateandequitymarketsshoc

16、ksareincreasedby60and12%respectively.ThescaleoflossinflictedbytheGlobalPropertyCrashScenariohasbeenveryroughlycalibratedtocorrespondtoaneventthathappensaboutonceacenturyonaverage,a1-in-100yearevent.Twoindicatorsthatmaygiveasenseofthelikelihoodofacatastrophescenariooccurringareitsimpactonequityreturn

17、sandGDPgrowthrates,whichareexpectedtobenegativeinthethroesofacatastrophe.US(UK)equitiesoverthelasttwohundredyears4haveexperiencedreturnratesbelow-24%(-13%)aboutonceintwentyyears,withreturnratesbelow-36%(-20%)onceinevery100years(1-in-100).Inourscenariovariants,thosereturnratesaresimilarregardingtheUS

18、,withreturnratesof-20%forSiand-40%forS2,andmuchmoredramaticfortheUKwherethescenarioreturnratesare-70%forSiand-73%forS2.Thatis,theUSdatasuggestthatanimpactatthescaleoftheGlobalPropertyCrashScenarioismorelikelythana1-in-100yeareventwhileintheUKitwouldappeartobemuchlesslikelyfromanhistoricalperspective

19、.ThehistoricalrecordofeconomicgrowthintheUS(UK)showsgrowthratesbelow-7%(-3%)as1-in-20yearevents,andratesbelow-13%(-5%)as1-in-100yearevents.InSiandS2thoseratesarecalculatedas-1%and-4%fortheUS,and-6.0%and-8.3%fortheUK.AgaintheimpactlevelofaGlobalPropertyCrashScenarioseemsmorelikelythana1-in-100eventin

20、theUSandlesslikelythana1-in-100eventintheUK.Thisisastresstest,notapredictionThisreportisoneofaseriesofstresstestscenariosthathavebeendevelopedbytheUniversityofCambridgeCentreforRiskStudiestoexploremanagementprocessesfordealingWithextremeshocks.Itdoesnotpredictwhenacatastrophemayunfold.Itdoeshoweverp

21、rovideinsightintothetypesofexposurethatmaybeexperiencedifasimilarcatastropheweretooccur.AcascadeofburstingpropertybubblesThebubbleburstsThetriggerforthisfinancialcatastropheisthecollapseofinvestorconfidenceinthepropertymarketsofSouthEastAsia,semergingeconomies.Thistriggersaregionalshiftininvestorbeh

22、aviourwhichcollapsesthepropertymarketsinChinaandIndia.FinancialtsunamiacrossthePacificTheburstingpropertybubbleinChinaripplesthroughinternationalfinancialandbankingsystems.ItarrivesfirstinAustralia,andthentravelsacrosstoNewZealandandCanada.ContagiongoesglobalThenextcasualtyistheNordicPrOPertymarkets

23、,witheconomistsidentifyingtheburstingbubbleasaaglobalcollapse,TheUKhousingmarketcrashesandpropertypricesplummetacrossEurope.Withinayearoftheproperty7collapsetheIMFdeclaresaglobalrecession.QuarterlyglobalGDPgrowthratesreachalowofby-1.5%.Commoditypricesfallbyover20%,puttingmanyeconomiesintoadeflationa

24、ryspiral.GlobalGDPimpactInmacroeconomicterms,theGlobalPropertyCrashScenarioinducesshockstoinflation,shortterminterestrates,equityindices,countrycreditratings,andGDPgrowthrates.WeestimatetheeffectsoftheseshocksontheworldeconomyusingtheGlobalEconomicModel(GEM)ofOxfordEconomics,.Inparticularwedetermine

25、thecumulativelosstoglobalgrossdomesticproductovera5yearperiod,dubbed“GDPRiSk”.Nationswitharelativelyhigherproportionofgovernmentdebt,coupledwithhighlyinflatedpropertymarketsexperiencethemostsevereeconomicconsequences.ThisscenarioattributesmorethanhalfoftotalGDPlossestotheUSandEuropeaneconomies,andcr

26、eatesadeepglobalrecessionlastinguptosixquarters.TheSivarianthasaglobalGDPRiskofUS$13.2trillion,whiletheS2varianthasaglobalGDPRiskof19.6trillion.AcaveatisthatthisanalysisviatheGEMdoesnotaccountforextraordinaryinterventionbynationalgovernmentstostabilisetheirrealestate,equity,orbankingmarkets.ThustheG

27、DPRiskfigurescanbeviewedasanassessmentoffundamentaleconomiclossesthatcouldotherwisebemaskedbygovernments,whoseactionswouldpostponeorspreadeconomiclossesoveralongerperiodWithOUtrestoringthecumulativelostvalue.FinancialportfolioimpactWeestimatetheportfolioimpactsofthisscenariobymodellingtheoutputsfrom

28、OEMonportfolioreturns,projectingmarketchangesandcashflowswhilekeepingthevalueofassetallocationfixed.Wedefaultallcorporatebondsandresidentialmortgagebackedsecurities(RMBS)givenbythe2008defaultrates.Interestingly,theSiscenariobeginstorecoverafterthreeyears,whiletheS2variantdoesnotrecoveroverthefiveyea

29、rmodellingperiod.ThemaximumdorntumexperiencedfortheconservativeportfoliointheSivariantoccursinYr1Q4withadeclineof15.4%.TheworstperformingequitiesareUKstocks(FTSE-100),whilethebestperformingequitiesareGermanstocks(DAX).TheworstperformingfixedincomebondsareJapanesebondswhileUSbondsperformthebest.Thewo

30、rstperformingportfoliostructureistheaggressiveportfoliowithadeclineof-22.5%intheSivariant.RiskmanagementstrategiesScenariosasstresstestsThisscenarioisanillustrationoftherisksposedbysocialunresttriggeredbycatastrophicevent.TheGlobalPropertyCrashscenarioisjustoneexampleofawiderangeofscenariosthatcould

31、occur.SummaryofEffectsofGlobalPropertyCrashScenarioandVariantsScenarioVariantS1S2VariantDescriptionStandardScenarioScenarioVariantAffectedPropertyMarketsTiers1-6Tiers1-9HousingPriceShock20-30%25-60%EquityPriceShock5-8%5-12%MarketConfidenceShock30-5030-70MaCrOeCOnOmiCIOSSeSGlobalrecessionseverity(Min

32、imumqtrlygrowthrateglobalGDP)-3.5%-4.7%Globalrecessionduration4Qtrs6QtrsGDPRiSk$Tr(5yearlossofglobaloutput)$13.2Trillion$19.6TrillionGDP(三)Risk%(as%of5-yearbaselineGDP)3.3%5.0%POrtfOliOImPaCtPerformanceatperiodofmaxdownturnHighFixedIncome-7%-7%Conservative-15%-23%Balanced-19%-28%Aggressive-23%-33%AS

33、SetClaSSPerfOrTnanCeYr1Qr4Yr3Qr4Yr1Qr4Yr3Qr4USEquities(W5000),%Change-20%4%-39%-36%UKEquities(FTSE100),%Change-72%-43%-73%-49%USTreasuries2yrNotes,%Change0%3%0%5%USTreasuries10yrNotes,%Change2%15%2%17%Table1:SummaryimpactsoftheGlobalPropertyCrashscenarioTrillionUS$GDPRiskacrossscenariosS2X1*Millenni

34、alUprisingSocialUnrestRisk1.64.68.1谡DollarDeposedDe-AmericanizationoftheFinancialSystemRisk1.91.6-1.6SybilLogicBombCyberCatastropheRisk4.57.415FHighInflationWorldFoodandOilPriceSpiralRisk4.9810.9SaoPaoloInfluenzaVirusPandemicRisk71023EurozoneMeltdownSovereignDefaultRisk11.216.323.2GlobalPropertyCras

35、hAssetBubbleCollapseRisk13.219.6China-SpanConflictGeopoliticalWarRisk1727322007-12GreatFinancialCrisis18GreatFinancialCrisisat201420Table2:GDP(三)RiskimpactoftheGlobalPropertyCrashscenariocomparedwithpreviousCentreforRiskStudiesstresstestscenarios2FinancialCatastropheStressTestScenariosThisscenariois

36、anillustrationoftherisksposedbyaplausiblebutextremefinancialmarketbasedcatastrophe.Itrepresentsjustoneexampleofsuchacatastropheandisnotaprediction.Itisawhat?if,exercise,designedtoprovideastresstestforriskmanagementpurposesbyinstitutionsandinvestorswishingtoassesshowtheirsystemswouldfareunderextremec

37、ircumstances.ThisscenarioisoneofaseriesofstresstestscenariosdevelopedbytheCentreforRiskStudiestoexplorethemanagementprocessesfordealingwithanextremeshockevent.Itisoneoffourfinancialmarketcatastrophescenariosbeingmodelledunderthisworkpackageandincludesthefollowing: DollarDeposed:De-Americanisationoft

38、heGlobalFinancialSystem; HighInflationWorld:FoodandOilPriceSpiral; EurozoneMeltdown:SovereignDefaultCrisis.Thescenariospresentaframeworkforunderstandinghowglobaleconomicandfinancialcollapsewillimpactregions,sectorsandbusinessesthroughoutthenetworkedstructureoftheeconomy.Thesefinancialstresstestsaimt

39、oimproveorganisations,operationalriskmanagementplanstoformcontingenciesandstrategiesforsurvivingandminimisingtheimpactsfrommarket-basedfinancialcatastrophe.Inparticular,thestresstestsallowinstitutionstomanageandbuildresiliencetodifferentformsofriskduringperiodsoffinancialstress.Theserisksinclude: fi

40、nancialandinvestmentriskstemmingfromacollapseinassetpricesacrossdifferentsectorsandregions; supplychainriskandtheabilityofaninstitutiontoeffectivelymanageitsinputrequirementsthroughitssupplychain,tomeetinternalproductionandoperationalrequirements; customerdemandriskandknowledgeforhowdemandmightshift

41、forgoodsandservicesduringperiodsoflowinvestmentandconsumerspending; marketorsegmentationriskandanunderstandingofhowotherfirmswithinthesamesectorwillreactandperformduringperiodsoffinancialstressandhowthismayimpactonthebusiness; reputationalriskandtheprotectionofbrandimageforreactingappropriatelyandco

42、nfidentlyundercrisisconditions.Eachindividualscenariomayrevealsomeaspectsofpotentialvulnerabilityforanorganisation,buttheyareintendedtobeexploredasasuiteinordertoidentifywaysofimprovingoverallresiliencetounexpectedshocksthatarecomplexandhavemultifacetedimpacts.Marketcatastropheriskandfinancialcontag

43、ionTheGreatFinancialCrisisof2007-8notonlyrevealedtheextenttowhichtheglobalfinancialsystemisinterconnectedbuthowinterrelationshipsbetweencommercialbanks,investmentbanks,centralbanks,corporations,governments,andhouseholdscanultimatelyleadtosystemicinstability.Asglobalfinancialsystemsbecomeincreasingly

44、interconnected,ashocktoonepartofthesystemhasthepotentialtosendacascadeofdefaultsthroughouttheentirenetwork.In2008,itwasonlythroughgovernmentinterventionintheformofextensivebailoutpackagesthatawidespreadcollapseoftheglobalfinancialsystemwasavoided.Newmodelsoftheglobalfinancialsystemareanessentialtool

45、foridentifyingandassessingpotentialrisksandvulnerabilitiesthatmayleadtoasystemicfinancialcrisis.Theliteratureidentifiesthreetypesofsystemicrisk:(i)build-upofwide-spreadimbalances,(ii)exogenousaggregateshocksand(iii)contagion(Sarlin,2013).Similarlyweworkwiththreeanalyticalmethodsthathelpdealwithdecis

46、ionsupport:(i)early-warningsystems,(ii)macrostress-testing,and(iii)contagionmodels.AllthreemethodsareactivelyunderresearchintheCentreforRiskStudiesandutilisedinthedevelopmentofthesestresstestscenarios.UnderstandingfinancialcatastrophethreatsThisscenarioexplorestheconsequencesofafinancialmarketcatast

47、rophebyexaminingthenotional-in-100possibilityforaHighInflationWorldScenarioandexamininghowtheshockwouldworkthroughthesystem.Foraprocessthattrulyassessesresiliencetomarketcatastrophe,weneedtoconsiderhowdifferentmarket-basedcatastrophesoccurandthenpropagatetheseshocksthroughglobalfinancialandeconomicsystems.Thisexercisewouldideallyincludeathoroughanalysisforeachdifferenttypeofmarketcatastropheinadditiontothefourfinancialcatastrophesincludedinthissuiteofstresstests.Suchananalysiswouldalsoincludearangeofdifferentseveritiesandcharacteristicsforthesescenarioswouldoccurasaresultofthesedifferentfin

展开阅读全文
相关资源
猜你喜欢
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 在线阅读 > 生活休闲


备案号:宁ICP备20000045号-1

经营许可证:宁B2-20210002

宁公网安备 64010402000986号